1.Baranov A.N.Lingvisticheskaya ekspertiza teksta [Linguistic examination of the text]. – Moskva; Flinta: Nauka [Science], 2010. 2.Vezhbitskaya A. Poznanie.[ Language. Cognition] – Moskva; Russkie slovari [Russian dictionaries], 1997.
3.Ivanov Vyach. Lingvistika tret'ego tysyacheletiya: voprosy k budushchemu [Linguistics of the third millennium: questions for the future]. – Moskva, 2004. 4.Leont'ev A.A. Nadgrobnoe slovo “chistoi lingvistike”., Lingvistika na iskhode KhKh veka: itogi i perspektivy: Tezisy mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii. [Eulogy 'pure linguistics'., Linguistics at the end of the twentieth century: Results and Prospects: Proceedings of International Conference. – Moskva; MGU, 1995.
Jun 23, 2017 - Baranov, A.N. (2007), Lingvisticheskaya ekspertiza teksta: teoreticheskie osnovaniya i praktika [Linguistic expertise of a text: theoretical. Article as pdf 0 Comments Share. Baranov, Lingvisticheskaya ekspertiza teksta: Teoreticheskie osnovaniia i praktika; uchebnoe posobie [Linguistic.
Li V.S., Karymsakova R.D., Tapalova R.B. Lingvisticheskoe issledovanie konfliktnogo teksta v yuridicheskoi praktike [Linguistic study of the text of the conflict in the practice of law]. – Almaty: Kazak universiteti, 2008. Slovar' russkogo yazyka [Dictionary of Russian language].
– Moskva: Russkii yazyk [Russian language], 1984. Tolkovyi slovar' russkogo yazyka.[ Explanatory Dictionary of Russian.] edited by N.Yu. - Moskva; Publishing center «Azbukovnik», 2008. Khrolenko A.T. Osnovy lingvokul'turologii [Fundamentals of Linguistic Cultural Studies]. - Moskva; Flinta: Nauka [Science], 2009. Shatunovskii I.B.
Semantika predlozheniya i nereferentnye slova (znachenie, kommunikativnaya perspektiva, pragmatika)[ Semantics deals and non-referential words (meaning, communicative perspective, pragmatics)]. – Moskva; Yazyki russkoi kul'tury [Languages of Russian culture], 1996.
Abstract Background. This study addresses a current problem relating to trust and the identification of gender differences in trust/mistrust manifestation. Gender identity is associated with cultural stereotypes and social roles, which facilitate the formation of trust in people.
A with the logo at the top • The member states of the (CARICOM) recently [ ] began issuing passports with a. Common designs [ ]. Chistij blank pasporta ukraine.
It acts as a significant integral meaning-based component of an individual’s “I”- conception, which contributes to the formation of trust in himself and the world around him. To study features of trust/mistrust towards others in young people with different gender identities. Tow truck mods for rigs of rods trucks. The cross-gender-typical sample consisted of 179 representatives, 83 males and 96 females, ages 17 to 23 (M = 19.34 and SD = 1.79).
The techniques for collecting data included the MMPI, the Sex-Role Inventory by S. Bem, and the Trust/Mistrust towards Others questionnaire by A.
The results were processed via the Mann-Whitney U Test, the Kruskal-Wallis H criterion, and cluster analysis. Criteria of trust/mistrust among the youth with different gender identities were identified, and basic types of trust — categoric, irrational–emotional, ambivalent– contradictory, and non-differentiated — were singled out.
Irrespective of biological sex, bearers of different gender identities do not exhibit the same criteria to determine trust/ mistrust. This study makes it possible to enrich our understanding of the role of social gender in the formation of interpersonal trust and differences in the foundations of trust toward others, in people with different gender identities.